Brad Sigmon, a 67-year-old death row inmate, is responsible for a brutal double murder. He has in a spine-chilling turn of events requested a rare and controversial method of execution – a firing squad. This sort of request was last made 15 years ago in the United States. This news has shaken the public, questioning the ethics surrounding capital punishment.
A Crime That Shocked South Carolina
Sentenced to death in 2001, Brad Sigmon was prosecuted based on the horrifying murders of his ex-girlfriend, Rebecca Barbre’s parents in Greenville County, South Carolina. He brutally beat her parents to death with a baseball bat in their own home. Then thereafter, he kidnapped Rebecca at gunpoint. Luckily, she managed to escape. In addition to these two death sentences, he has also received a 30-year prison sentence for first-degree burglary. This only solidified his place on South Carolina’s death row.
The End of Execution Appeals and a Final Date
Spending over two decades behind bars, he also saw numerous execution appeals rejected. Sigmon’s execution is scheduled to happen on March 7, 2025. Capital punishment cases can drag on for years, but this is finally the end of the line for Sigmon after his rather long journey through the justice system.
South Carolina’s Execution Options
Death row inmates are able to choose their own method of execution as South Carolina law allows. They may select from the electric chair, lethal injection, or a firing squad. The default method is the electric chair if no choice is made by the inmate. Albeit grim, this policy offers inmates a degree of agency.
The decision Sigmon made has not only made history but is contentious. Since 1976, only three other inmates in the United States have opted to be executed by gunfire. the most recent was Ronnie Lee Gardner in 2010 in Utah who faced the same fate.
Read More: Woman Who Used Suicide Pod Reportedly Discovered With ‘Strangulation’ Marks Inside
The Firing Squad: A Rare and Macabre Method
Sigmon will be executed by firing squad at Road River Correctional Institution in Columbia as this is where he’s currently incarcerated. The procedure is known to be precise and holds deep symbolism. He will be placed in a chair, strapped down with a hood placed over his head. A target will be fixed over his heart and three volunteers will stand positioned 15 feet away, firing through a small opening.
Why Not Lethal Injection or Electric Chair?
Gerald ‘Bo’ King, Sigmon’s attorney has reasoned his client’s decision for execution by firing squad over more conventional methods. “He didn’t end up choosing the electric chair because it would ‘burn and cook him alive,’” King told CBS News. Lethal injection was ruled out even though it’s considered more humane.
King explained that Sigmon’s decision was based on recent traumatic experiences suffered by three inmates who were executed by lethal injection. “If he chose lethal injection, he risked the prolonged death suffered by all three of the men South Carolina has executed since September. Three men Brad knew and cared for — who remained alive, strapped to a gurney. For more than twenty minutes,” he said.
A Painful and Pragmatic Choice
King emphasized the gravity of Sigmon’s decision. Stating, “Brad has no illusions about what being shot will do to his body.” he also highlighted that while the firing squad may be more painful, it is the least inhumane choice under South Carolina’s execution protocols. Another spokesperson for Sigmon, Courtney Farrell announced that preparations for his execution were underway.
The Ethical Debate Reignites
Sigmon’s decision to face the firing squad has brought on public debate from the efficacy to the ethics of capital punishment. While proponents claim that justice for heinous crimes necessitates such measures, critics argue that no method of execution is free from suffering or controversy. As we watch, the clock ticks down for Sigmon.
Read More: Inside The Troubled Upbringing of Charles Manson