The United Nations estimates that the current world population is 8.2 billion and projects that it will peak at roughly 10.3 billion people by the mid-2080s. These figures are a rough estimate and may not accurately reflect the true number of people on Earth. A controversial new study suggests this figure could be wildly incorrect, particularly when conducting a census in rural areas. Researchers from Aalto University in Finland propose that rural populations worldwide are being severely undercounted. They are inflating the global population beyond the UN’s current estimates by undercounting these populations.
The Challenge of Counting Rural Populations
Conducting a census of the world’s population is a difficult task to undertake, especially in rural areas. While some countries have robust and effective census systems, others struggle with incomplete data collection. The most important input for the datasets is national population censuses, which face many obstacles, such as financial limitations. The insufficient funding compromises the census, rendering the census incomplete and delayed.
There are an estimated 850 million people globally who lack identification documents. Rural regions are usually out of reach, suffering from lack of accessibility to amenities and sparsely populated. Census workers therefore find it difficult to reach these areas. The census workers also experience difficulties in communication due to language barriers and a reluctance of communities to participate. Additionally, communities within rural areas could be impacted by violence. These obstacles have led to underreporting of the population in rural areas.
Population datasets from urban areas of the world often rely on satellite data, which captures urban environments. The dense infrastructure and bright nighttime lights make populations in these areas far easier to map with the satellite. But within rural areas and villages, which are often hidden by trees or consist of small, scattered buildings, can be nearly invisible from space.
Read More: Map Shows Impact Nuclear War Would Have on 75% of US Population
Uncovering the Discrepancy
Researchers at Aalto University unintentionally came across this issue while researching the impact of dam construction on population displacement. They analyzed the data from 307 dam projects across 35 countries, including China, Brazil, Australia, and Poland, to put a number on how many people were displaced by the dams. Aalto University researchers unintentionally discovered a sizable discrepancy between reported displaced populations and existing population datasets.
They compared these figures to five major global datasets and discovered that underestimations of rural populations averaged 53%, with some estimates being off by as much as 84%. This means that even the most credible datasets have only captured roughly half of the people living in rural areas. The researchers are cautious about projecting global figures from their datasets but believe their findings provide a representative sample for the world’s population. They plan to expand their analysis to include more recent data, as the current study only covers up to 2010.
Most of the data collected for the study comes from China and other parts of Asia are known to undercount on population census. However, this may not apply to places like Finland and other countries with extensive registration systems.
Implications of Undercounting rural populations
Governments and international organizations rely on these datasets to allocate resources, for infrastructure planning, disease epidemiology, and disaster risk management. The underestimation of rural populations has severe implications. If the data is false or inconclusive, the consequences can be dire. Disaster risk maps that underestimate rural populations might lead to further lack of access to imperative services such as emergency services, healthcare planning, and adequate medical care in the event of a widespread infection or natural disaster.
We must actively address the alarming reality that half of the world’s population still resides in rural areas by using accurate datasets to prevent these areas from being left behind. We should reflect any large underestimation of rural populations in other metrics, actively adjusting figures for energy consumption, food production, and mobile phone usage accordingly. This raises questions as to how such large discrepancies went unnoticed by governments.
Future Research development
Future research must focus on developing more accurate and comprehensive population datasets, including datasets from rural areas, to address these discrepancies. It’s evident that by allocating more resources to population census efforts to collect data from rural areas, research can mitigate these biases. Alternative methods of dataset research include collecting information from diverse data sources, such as mobile phone records, satellite imagery, and on-the-ground surveys, to improve estimates of rural populations. Additionally, international collaboration is essential to standardize data collection methods and ensure that all regions are adequately represented in global statistics.
Fixing the numbers
The recent study from Aalto University highlights a critical issue in global population estimation: the systematic underestimation of rural populations. While it does not definitively prove that the world’s population is much higher than reported, it highlights the need for more robust investment in resources to aid in the collection of accurate population data. This is especially imperative for rural areas, where datasets from these areas remain extremely inconclusive. As the world moves towards achieving sustainable development goals, ensuring that rural populations are not left behind is paramount.
Read More: Scientists Confirm Earth is Gradually Tilting Toward Its Next Ice Age