Walmart systematically overcharged customers and sold underweight products at 280 California stores, according to prosecutors who secured a $5.6 million settlement with the retailer. The agreement with Santa Clara, San Diego, San Bernardino, and Sonoma counties resolves allegations of false advertising and unfair competition violations.
The Arkansas-based company operates over 4,000 stores nationwide and ranks as America’s largest retailer. The settlement covers alleged pricing violations on produce, baked goods, and prepared items.
Where the Penalties and Costs Go
According to court documents, the $5.6 million payment breaks down into $5.5 million in civil penalties and $139,908.92 to cover investigation costs incurred by various county Weights and Measures departments. Santa Clara County will receive $1.375 million that will go directly into its Consumer Protection Fund.
Prosecutors alleged two specific violations of California law. First, they charged customers prices higher than the lowest advertised or posted prices displayed in stores. Second, the company sold loose items, including fruits, vegetables, and baked goods, with actual weights below the amounts shown on product labels. Ten of the affected stores operate in Santa Clara County.
The court also ordered Walmart to assign employees at each California store to regularly verify that prices and product weights are accurate. This goes beyond the typical financial penalty. Prosecutors wanted to force operational changes that would prevent future violations.
Inside the Price and Weight Inspections
Several California counties worked together to build this case. The Santa Clara County Weights and Measures Division led the investigation with assistance from the Division of Agriculture and the Department of Environmental Health. Inspectors documented pricing discrepancies and weight accuracy violations through systematic checks at locations.
Supervising Deputy District Attorney Bud Porter warned other retailers to take notice. “We hope the judgment sends a message to other businesses, that they need to address these pricing issues that are harming consumers. Yet, we anticipate there will be some who will have to learn the hard way.“
Instead of going to trial, prosecutors chose to negotiate a settlement. This approach lets them secure immediate financial penalties while requiring Walmart to make operational changes to prevent future problems.
The Message to Large Retailers
In announcing the settlement, Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen delivered a clear message about pricing accuracy expectations. “When someone brings an item to the register to be scanned, the price must be right,” Rosen said. “They expect it. California expects it. My Office expects it, and we will apply the law to make sure of it.”
Supervising Deputy District Attorney Bud Porter expressed a broader warning to other retailers. “We hope the judgment sends a message to other businesses that they need to address these pricing issues that are harming consumers. Yet, we anticipate there will be some who will have to learn the hard way.“
Prosecutors chose to negotiate a settlement instead of going to trial. The agreement still needed court approval. This approach allowed for the operational requirements while securing immediate financial penalties and consumer protection improvements.
A Two-Decade Pattern in California
This marks Walmart’s third lawsuit since early 2024 involving pricing and weighing issues, continuing a pattern spanning nearly two decades. The company paid $2.1 million in 2012 for comparable overcharging violations after failing to comply with a 2008 court judgment that specifically required the retailer to fix pricing errors.
The 2012 case followed 2005 investigations that discovered more than 100 California stores charging customers higher prices than advertised amounts. These findings triggered the original court judgment that the retail giant later violated, leading to the 2012 penalties.
“Consumers should feel confident that the price on the shelf will be the same price they are charged at the cash register,” then California Attorney General Kamala Harris said during the 2012 settlement announcement. “Californians who shop at Wal-Mart should know that they have the right to ask for the appropriate discount.”
The recurring nature of these violations raises questions about the company’s internal control systems and compliance procedures. Despite previous court orders and substantial financial penalties, the retail giant continues facing identical allegations involving basic pricing accuracy and product weight standards.
Compliance Pressures Across the Business
The settlement adds pressure to Walmart during a challenging period. The company separately paid $45 million in June 2024 to settle a nationwide class action over weighted goods and bagged citrus pricing. The retailer also faces periodic boycotts over changes to diversity hiring initiatives and broader opposition to various corporate practices.
The company has advanced technology to track inventory and pricing. The repeated failures suggest the company either lacks proper oversight or doesn’t prioritize compliance.
A Brief Statement From Walmart
The retailer provided only a brief statement to media outlets about the settlement. The company said it was “pleased this matter is resolved,” but the company did not admit liability or wrongdoing as part of the agreement. The company avoided acknowledging the specific violations or committing to particular operational improvements beyond those required by the court order.
The minimal response contrasts with the detailed operational requirements imposed by the settlement and the substantial financial penalties. The company’s reluctance to discuss specific improvements may reflect concerns about admitting liability in other pending cases.
Steps for Filing an Overcharge Complaint
Customers who were overcharged at Walmart can file complaints with local enforcement agencies. The settlement includes ongoing monitoring requirements that will help enforcement agencies track the retailer’s compliance with pricing accuracy standards. The operational requirements for dedicated pricing accuracy employees represent a systematic approach to preventing future violations rather than simply imposing financial penalties.
The joint enforcement effort shows California takes consumer protection seriously. Counties are willing to work together and impose big penalties when retailers overcharge customers across multiple areas.
Read More: FDA Issues Warning: Shrimp Sold at Walmart Could Be Radioactive